As games become more detailed and feature bigger worlds to discover, the VRAM requirement will rise. PriceĪMD Radeon (Image credit: Windows Central)Īlthough a higher amount of VRAM in a GPU doesn't necessarily dictate better performance, it definitely bodes well for the future. It is evident that both of these GPUs are great options for anyone looking for 1080p gaming and even some decent 1440p gaming.Īs for the lower-VRAM counterparts, the difference in performance from their higher-VRAM siblings is relatively narrow in most circumstances, and many people may not notice any major differences - at least not until you find a game that actually requires more VRAM than your GPU has, in which case you'll be kicking yourself for not going with the higher-VRAM option. When playing Fallout 4 at 1440p, the GTX 1060 (6GB) averaged about 42 FPS and the RX 480 (8GB) averaged about 43 FPS. In another test, this time playing Fallout 4 at 1080p with Ultra settings using DX11, the GTX 1060 (6GB) and the RX 480 (8GB) averaged about 66 FPS. Under the same settings but using DX12, the RX 480 (8GB) averaged about the same 86 FPS while the GTX 1060 (6GB) dipped down to an average of about 82 FPS. To be more specific, when playing Battlefield 1 at 1080p with Ultra settings using DirectX 11, the RX 480 (8GB) averaged about 86 frames per second (FPS) while the GTX 1060 (6GB) averaged about 90 FPS. Extensive benchmark testing performed by Hardware Canucks reveals that the performance of the RX 480 (8GB) and the GTX 1060 (6GB) are very close.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |